USPTO serial 75427084
KRT KRAUS REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KRT KRAUS REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE K WADE
STEPHANIE K WADE ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated compressor packages for compressing, storing, and dispensing natural gas, namely, a complete station that draws natural gas from utility lines, compresses the gas, and stores the gas in storage tanks which are interconnected by pipework to a dispenser which is used to refuel vehicles that run on natural gas, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |