USPTO serial 75427179
BRIDGEWATER CANDLE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIDGEWATER CANDLE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M MOOSE
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING PAPO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Scented granules, fragranced essential oils for personal use, aromatherapy refresher oils and scented envelope sachets | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles and scented candles, namely, jar candles, votives and pillars, not for use with candlesticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Air fresheners and aromatic sprays in the nature of an aerosol | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |