USPTO serial 75427660
LL LARKSPUR LANDING HOME SUITE HOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2999408Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LL LARKSPUR LANDING HOME SUITE HOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GREENWICH, CT, US
LARKSPUR, CA, US
LARKSPUR HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS
LARKSPUR, CA, US
Larkspur Hospitality Company, LLC
Larkspur, CA, US
LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
CORTE MADERA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
CORTE MADERA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
CORTE MADERA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner, Esq.
LL MEZZ HOLDINGS II, L.P.591 WEST PUTNAM AVENUEGREENWICH, CT 06830UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | extended stay hotel lodging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LL MEZZ HOLDINGS II, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOTELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS
- Other trademarks owned by Larkspur Hospitality Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LL LARKSPUR LANDING HOME SUITE HOTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 7, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 7, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |