USPTO serial 75427819
RAPID-WRITE REPORTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAPID-WRITE REPORTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SYLVIA BECKER
4727 WILLSHIRE BLVD STE 401LOS ANGELES, CA 90010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | COURT REPORTING SERVICES MAINTAINING LEGAL FILES FOR OTHERS, INCLUDING CENTRALIZED NOTICING AND COORDINATION OF DEPOSITIONS; FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS; PARALEGAL SERVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING GRAPHIC ART ILLUSTRATIONS AND COMPUTERIZED ANIMATION FOR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS; VIDEOTAPING OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS; NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SERVICE OF PROCESS, INCLUDING SUBPEONAS, COMPLAINTS, AND SUMMONSES; PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS; ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION; | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |