USPTO serial 75427920
QUANTANOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2001
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUANTANOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Guildford, Surrey, GU1 1BA, GB
Guildford, Surrey, GU1 1BA, GB
Guildford, Surrey, GU1 1BA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDSON K CHAMPLIN
JUDSON K CHAMPLIN WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY900 2ND AVE S STE 1400 INTERNATIONAL CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF AND AMELIORATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CANCER; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; FOODS FOR MEDICALLY RESTRICTED DIETS; MEDICAL PREPARATIONS IN THE FORM OF PHOTOSENSITISOR COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF AND AMELIORATION OF CANCER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | LASERS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | MEDICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES; TESTING AND TRIALS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scotia QuantaNova Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Scotia QuantaNova Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Scotia QuantaNova Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUANTANOVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |