USPTO serial 75428000
MILLENNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILLENNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fletcher Challenge Canada Limited
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARLENE D HANKS
ARLENE D HANKS MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC2200 W MAIN ST STE 800DURHAM, NC 27705-4658UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |