USPTO serial 75428213
BEAUTY BRANDS SUPERSALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2000
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEAUTY BRANDS SUPERSALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation,
Kansas City, MO, US
Other trademarks owned by Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation,
Kansas City, MO, US
Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation,
Kansas City, MO, US
Other trademarks owned by Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation,
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
Cheryl L. Burbach Erise IP, P.A.7015 College Blvd.Suite 700Overland Park, KS 66211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of [ magazines, books, ] cosmetics, fragrances, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, soaps, nail care products, candles, sunglasses, massage oils, essential oils, bath and shower oil and gels, [ deodorants, ] baskets, [ pantyhose, ] personal care and grooming items, travel cases, hair accessories, diffusers, blow dryers, [ cleansing preparations, ] aroma therapies, [ jewelry and fashion accessories, atomizers, spray ] bottles, spa accessories, and gift novelties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Beauty salon services featuring hair care, hair styling, skin care, facials, body wraps, and nail treatments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation,
- Other trademarks owned by BEAUTY BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation,
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEAUTY BRANDS SUPERSALON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |