USPTO serial 75428869
PURE & CLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2000
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURE & CLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SUNRISE, FL
Sunrise, FL
VISTA, CA
SUNRISE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne M.J. Boisineau
Lynne M.J. Boisineau McDermott Will & Emery LLP18191 Von Karman Ave.Suite 500Irvine, CA 92612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AUTOMATIC SWIMMING POOL CHLORINATING MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 28, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by D.J. COMPANY, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by KREEPY KRAULY USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POLARIS POOL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by D.J. COMPANY, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named PURE & CLEAR
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |