Drawing for CLEVELAND SPORTS HALL OF FAME CAFE

USPTO serial 75429062

CLEVELAND SPORTS HALL OF FAME CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEVELAND SPORTS HALL OF FAME CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES R ELEY

JAMES R ELEY KEGLER BROWN HILL & RITTER LPA65 E STATE ST STE 1800COLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 26, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 24, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance