USPTO serial 75429257
DOCDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOCDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES P BACALL
CHARLES P BACALL VERRILL & DANA LLPP O BOX 586PORTLAND, ME 04112-0586UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | MANUFACTURE OF DIGITAL, OPTICAL AND MAGNETIC DISCS, NAMELY, COMPACT DISCS, LASER VIDEO DISCS, INTERACTIVE COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, AND CD-ROMS, AND COMPUTER DISCS, AND DIGITAL, OPTICAL AND MAGNETIC TAPES, NAMELY, VIDEO CASSETTES, AUDIO CASSETTES AND DIGITAL AUDIO TAPES, ALL TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; MEDIA DUPLICATION OF DATA TO DIGITAL, OPTICAL AND MAGNETIC DISCS, NAMELY, COMPACT DISCS, LASER VIDEO DISCS, INTERACTIVE COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, AND CD-ROMS AND COMPUTER DISCS AND DIGITAL, OPTICAL AND MAGNETIC TAPES, NAMELY VIDEO CASSETTES, AUDIO CASSETTES, AND DIGITAL AUDIO TAPES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |