Drawing for BEST COMPANY

USPTO serial 75429421

BEST COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men, women and children, namely coats, raincoats, waistcoats, blouses and pullovers, jackets, wind resistent jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, shirts and chemises, t-shirts, sweaters, underwear, socks and stockings, gloves, ties, scarfs, hats and caps, belts, boots, shoes and slippersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 15, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 19991.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance