USPTO serial 75429644
OPENDWG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2672409Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 2003
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPENDWG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shawn M. Lindsay
SHAWN M. LINDSAY HARRIS BERNE CHRISTENSEN LLP15350 SW Sequoia ParkwaySuite 250Portland, OR 97224Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the exchange of information regarding computer aided design and computer software containing standards for the application of computer aided design | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OpenDWG Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by OpenDWG Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by OpenDWG Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by OPEN DESIGN ALLIANCE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OPENDWG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |