USPTO serial 75430021
SMART.FX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2520478Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2001
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART.FX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RODNEY M. ANDERSON
RODNEY M. ANDERSON ANDERSON, LEVINE & LINTEL LLP14785 PRESTON RD STE 650DALLAS, TX 75254-6812UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting in design, integration, control, supply and installation of electronic systems in homes, such as lighting, telephone, cable, intercom, multi-media, security, energy, home theatre and multi-room audio/video | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT HOME SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFITECH MEDIA SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT HOME SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT HOME SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMART.FX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |