USPTO serial 75430336
ARGUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARGUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R RUTHERFORD
CHARLES R RUTHERFORD DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1577 N WOODWARD AVE STE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-2820UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT AND NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF METAL OR PLASTIC PRODUCTION PARTS, NAMELY, FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE, AEROSPACE, AGRICULTURE AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES, AND FOR MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |