USPTO serial 75431068
BEAUTY BRANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2000
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEAUTY BRANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
Cheryl L. Burbach Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of magazines, books, cosmetics, fragrances, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, soaps, nail care products, candles, sunglasses, massage oils, essential oils, bath and shower oil and gels, deodorants, baskets, pantyhose, personal care and grooming items, travel cases, hair accessories, diffusers, blow dryers, cleansing preparations, aroma therapies, jewelry and fashion accessories, atomizers, spray bottles, spa accessories, and gift novelties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 1995 |
| 042 | Beauty salon services featuring hair care, hair styling, skin care, facials, body wraps, and nail treatments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Brands Franchising Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEAUTY BRANDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |