USPTO serial 75431163
ACTION 21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTION 21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIRSTIN M JAHN
121 CALIFORNIA AVERENO, NV 89509UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GAMING SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE USED WITH PERSONAL COMPUTERS, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES OF VIRTUAL REALITY COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, GAMING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC, ELECTRO-MECHANICAL AND BATTERY OPERATED GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES; ARCADE GAMES; COIN-OPERATED VIDEO GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER GAME VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |