USPTO serial 75431354
LYNX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LYNX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZACHARY T WOBENSMITH III
6091 CARVERSVILLE/WISMER RDP O BOX 370PIPERSVILLE, PA 18947-0370Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Spark plug wire sets | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1976 |
| 008 | Hand-operated battery post and terminal cleaner tools in the nature of rotatable metal brushes which are engaged with the posts and terminals and hand-operated battery lifters | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1976 |
| 009 | Storage batteries,electric battery cables, emergency jumper cables, antifreeze testers which measure the specific gravity of the vehicles antifreeze mixture, battery terminals and battery holddown straps for vehicles | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1976 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |