USPTO serial 75432005
PARASITE EVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2004
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARASITE EVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
TOKYO, JP
Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I. PEROFF Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded compact discs featuring music | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Square Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Square Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Square Enix
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Square Enix
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PARASITE EVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |