USPTO serial 75432554
DECATHLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3105403Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DECATHLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGIL H MARSH
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER CHRISTEN & SABOL1725 K ST NW STE 1401WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1401UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |