Drawing for MEGATROPOLIS

USPTO serial 75432864

MEGATROPOLIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGATROPOLIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES W DABNEY

JAMES W DABNEY PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of amusement parks, amusement arcades and video game amusement centres featuring coin, ticket, bank note and token operated game machines; entertainment in the nature of providing gaming machines and coin, ticket, bank note and token operated virtual reality game machines in hotels and other places of public accommodation; casino services; entertainment services in the nature of production of live theatrical performances, live musical performances and live stage shows; and providing cinema theatresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 22, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 22, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance