USPTO serial 75432908
CITYCLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2001
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CITYCLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, Ontario, M4P 2C6, CA
TORONTO, Ontario, M4P 2C6, CA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, Ontario, M4P 2C6, CA
WOODBRIDGE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARKUS COHEN
MARKUS COHEN MARKUS COHEN LAW OFFICE22 ST CLAIR AVE E STE 1010TORONTO ON M4T 2S3CANADA,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | coating for eyeglass lenses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELPROP AUTHORITY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CITYCLEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |