USPTO serial 75433047
AIRWAVE MASSAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRWAVE MASSAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
d-76846 Hauenstein/Pfalz, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS M DE GUZMAN
DENNIS M DE GUZMAN MILLER NASH WIENER HAGER CARLSEN4400 2 UNION SQ601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHOES, SANDALS, BOOTS, CLOGS, GALOSHES, SLIPPERS, INSOLES FOR FOOTWEAR, BELTS, CAPS, HATS, LEATHER COATS, JACKETS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SOCKS, PANTS, T-SHIRTS AND GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |