USPTO serial 75433367
TELEPORTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2923513Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TELEPORTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENCINITAS, CA
ENCINITAS, CA
Helferich Thompson Trust Partnership, The
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by Helferich Thompson Trust Partnership, The
Helferich Thompson Trust Partnership, The
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by Helferich Thompson Trust Partnership, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin M. Zoltick
MARTIN M ZOLTICK ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PCSTE 8001425 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION TRANSCEIVERS USED FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING A VARIETY OF MEDIA TYPES SUCH AS TEXT, AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, FACSIMILES, ELECTRONIC MAIL, MUSIC, AND GRAPHICS, WHICH CAN BE USED ALONE OR WITH DEVICES SUCH AS TELEVISIONS, PAGERS, TELEPHONES, AND COMPUTERS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH THE ABOVE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HELFERICH, RICHARD J.
- Other trademarks owned by HELFERICH, RICHARD J.
- Other trademarks owned by Helferich Thompson Trust Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Helferich Thompson Trust Partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TELEPORTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |