USPTO serial 75433439
THE PRODIGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PRODIGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bocking, Braintree, Essex, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES V QUINN
CHARLES V QUINN DILLON BITAR & LUTHERP O BOX 398MORRISTOWN, NJ 07963-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; video recordings; phonograph records featuring the musical group Prodigy; video tape recordings featuring the musical group Prodigy; compact disks featuring the musical group Prodigy; cassettes featuring the musical group Prodigy | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1991 |
| 016 | Posters, souvenir programs concerning the musical group Prodigy | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1991 |
| 025 | T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, shorts, hats featuring the musical group Prodigy | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1991 |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, live performances by the musical group Prodigy | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |