Drawing for VIPER

USPTO serial 75433474

VIPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEBRA E KELLER

DEBRA E KELLER SHAPIRO BUCHMAN LLP1331 N CALIFORNIA BLVD STE 320WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software system designed to provide an integrated graphical environment for urban transportation planning applicationsABANDONEDSep 21, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 11, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 15, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance