Drawing for SAGA SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 75433549

SAGA SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAGA SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

COLETTE A DURST-BARKEY

ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY ET ALSTE 5000311 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN PERFORMANCE MONITORING, SESSION MANAGEMENT, AUTOMATED PRODUCTION AND SCHEDULING CONTROL, RESOURCE MAXIMIZATION AND HIGH VOLUME TRANSACTION PROCESSING, AND TO CONTROL AND ENSURE INTEGRITY OF OTHER COMPUTER PROGRAMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN WORD PROCESSING, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT, DATA RETRIEVAL, ARCHIVAL STORAGE, CALENDARING, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN GRAPHICS APPLICATIONS OR CREATION OF GRAPHICS, COMPUTER BASED TRAINING, CALCULATIONS AND THE MANIPULATION OF SPREADSHEET DATA AND SPREAD SHEETING, AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL DISTRIBUTION, COMMUNICATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT SOFTWARE FILES, COMMUNICATION WITHIN BUSINESS ENTITIES, COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN VARIOUS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENTS, NETWORKING BETWEEN DIFFERENT HARDWARE SYSTEMS, INTERFACING OR INTEGRATING BETWEEN NETWORKS OF HARDWARE, OPERATING SYSTEMS AND/OR SOFTWARE, INTERFACING BETWEEN COMPUTER DATABASES, AND TO COMMUNICATE AND INTERFACE BETWEEN DIFFERENT COMPUTER PLATFORMS AND IN LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS, FOR USE IN ROUTING OR MOVEMENT OF INFORMATION FROM ONE APPLICATION TO ANOTHER; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS FOR USE IN ENTERPRISE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION THAT PERMITS THE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA, TEXT, GRAPHICS AND CODE BETWEEN DIFFERENT APPLICATION PROGRAMS, OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PLATFORMS; PROVIDES AN INTERFACE BETWEEN THE COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR THE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA, TEXT, GRAPHICS AND CODE; AND ENABLES THE EXPANDED USE BY TRANSMITTING APPLICATION PROGRAMS VIA INTERCONNECTED COMPUTER NETWORKS AND LOCAL NETWORKS LINKED BY COMMON PROTOCOLS; ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE THAT ENABLES THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER APPLICATION PROGRAMS AND SOLVES DATE-RELATED PROBLEMS; AND COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS FOR USE WITH THE FOREGOING; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN INCIDENT TRACKING AND REPORTING AND PROBLEMS RESOLUTION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN CATALOGING, INVENTORY, TO CONTROL CIRCULATION, AND TO OTHERWISE CONTROL OPERATION OF A LIBRARY; COMPUTER PROGRAMS WHICH PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PRODUCT FIXES, PRODUCT MAINTENANCE AND PRODUCT INFORMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMS ACTING AS AN APPLICATIONS PROGRAMMING INTERFACE AND PROVIDING CONNECTIONS BETWEEN VARIOUS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RUNNING ON DIFFERENT HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PLATFORMS; AND COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS THEREFORACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance