USPTO serial 75434186
MAXSPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXSPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HANDBAGS, BACKPACKS, FANNY PACKS, GYM BAGS, LUGGAGE, DUFFLE BAGS, MESH SHOPPING BAGS, ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, TOILETRY BAGS AND COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, SHOPPING BAGS OF LEATHER AND TEXTILE, JEWELRY BAGS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |