USPTO serial 75434352
GEORGIA FRUIT CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2000
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GEORGIA FRUIT CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Doctrow
MICHAEL A DOCTROW MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC100 PINE STPO BOX 1166HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1166Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FRESH PEACHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 27, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |