USPTO serial 75434448
POWER CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL HASTINGS
PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 2400ATLANTA, GA 30308-2222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automotive parts, namely, spark plugs | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |