USPTO serial 75435519
ENERGY CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2003
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENERGY CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cook Inlet Energy Supply Limited Partnership
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Cook Inlet Energy Supply Limited Partnership
Cook Inlet Energy Supply Limited Partnership
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Cook Inlet Energy Supply Limited Partnership
COOK INLET ENERGY SUPPLY L.L.C.
LOS ANGELES, CA
COOK INLET ENERGY SUPPLY L.L.C.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A. TIDWELL
MARK A TIDWELL BRACEWELL & PATTERSON LLPPO BOX 6139HOUSTON, TX 77208-1389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Natural gas and electricity brokerage services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cook Inlet Energy Supply Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Cook Inlet Energy Supply Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by COOK INLET ENERGY SUPPLY L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by COOK INLET ENERGY SUPPLY L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ENERGY CITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |