USPTO serial 75435572
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVE D BYER
STEVE D BYER BEYER WEAVER & THOMAS LLPPO BOX 70250OAKLAND, CA 94612-0250UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of semiconductor cores, integrated circuits and computer software for use by the computer communications and computer networking industries | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |