USPTO serial 75435585
SPEECHWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEECHWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Great Shelford, Cambridge CB2 5LD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM M LEE JR
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE MANN SMITH MCWILLIAMSSWEENEY & OHLSONP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VOICE RECOGNITION APPARATUS, VOICE-ACTIVATED TELEPHONE APPARATUS; VOICE INTERACTIVE TELEPHONE APPARATUS AUTOMATIC VOICE INTERACTIVE TELEPHONE CALL PROCESSING APPARATUS AUTOMATIC MESSAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR RECOGNIZING SPEECH, ENCODING SPEECH, ALL FOR USE WITH THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |