Drawing for CASH$IN CARD

USPTO serial 75435740

CASH$IN CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASH$IN CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON & SCHEETZ LLP18TH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009magnetic coded cards and pre-paid telephone calling cards, magnetically encodedACTIVE—
016non-magnetic coded cards and telephone calling cards, not magnetically encodedACTIVE—
036banking services and financial information provided by electronic meansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 21, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 7, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 16, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance