Drawing for GRAFTSTENT

USPTO serial 75435808

GRAFTSTENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAFTSTENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005interventional medical device, namely, a stent wrapped with a xenograft for treating cardiovascular diseaseACTIVE
010interventional medical device, namely, a stent wrapped with a xenograft for treating cardiovascular diseaseINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Feb 10, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2000PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Feb 9, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance