Drawing for FIZZ BOMBS

USPTO serial 75436809

FIZZ BOMBS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIZZ BOMBS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS F SMEGAL JR

THOMAS F SMEGAL JR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003bath tabletsACTIVE—
005air freshenersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2001PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Jan 12, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 24, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance