USPTO serial 75436886
RIVA 128ZX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIVA 128ZX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc.
Carrollton, TX
Other trademarks owned by SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc.
SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc.
Carrollton, TX
Other trademarks owned by SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT COMPONENTS FOR GRAPHICS AND VIDEO SYSTEMS, NAMELY, MULTIMEDIA ACCELERATORS, GRAPHIC ACCELERATORS, AND ASSOCIATED COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OPERATING SAME | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NVIDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NVIDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RIVA 128ZX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |