USPTO serial 75438035
PAN-EL-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAN-EL-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Camarillo, CA
Camarillo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH J HOVET
KENNETH J HOVET KENNETH J HOVET LAW OFFICE4476 MARKET STSTE 601VENTURA, CA 93003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | flexible electroluminescent strips used to emit a soft luminescent glow for interior decoration and exterior architectural use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |