Drawing for DIAMONDLITE

USPTO serial 75438388

DIAMONDLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VAVONESE, DANIEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMONDLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 7, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 7, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 26, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 24, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance