USPTO serial 75438621
BASE BUSINESS AUTOMATED SYSTEMS E'OLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BASE BUSINESS AUTOMATED SYSTEMS E'OLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | collection of automated information systems for distributors (members) to access, monitor and manage their distributor accounts; nonmembers do not have access to nor should have a trade interest in this information system | ACTIVE | Oct 24, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1999 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |