USPTO serial 75439124
ECO-LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2700628Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2003
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECO-LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reno, NV
Yavne, IL
Yavne, IL
Yavne, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. David Starr
H. David Starr Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 SOUTH WEST STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Energy systems composed of machines, engines, turbines and electric generators for power generation; rehabilitation systems of energy systems composed of machines, engines, turbines and generators of electricity | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2002 |
| 009 | Electric apparatus composed of amp meter, voltmeter, wattmeter, varmeter, power meter, electricity meter, programmable logic controller, computer control and monitoring units, electric cables; rehabilitation systems for energy systems composed of electricity meters and electric cables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2002 |
| 011 | Rehabilitation systems of energy systems composed of heating boilers and heaters; power plants generating electricity | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ECO-LOGIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |