Drawing for THE WM COMPANY

USPTO serial 75439454

THE WM COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WM COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Accounting; computerized database management; computerized data processing; computerized data verification; economic forecasting and analysis, all for business purposes; business consultation services relating to all the aforesaid services; all of the aforesaid services provided to investment professionals representing large scale international investors and institutions, consisting of fund managers and owners, but not the investing publicACTIVE
036Valuation and analysis of investments; investment information and investment consultation services; investment research services; and preparation of reports relating to valuation and analysis of investments; all of the aforesaid services provided to investment professionals representing large scale international investors and institutions, consisting of fund managers and owners, but not the investing publicACTIVE
042Verification, namely, searching, checking and comparing computerized databases in the fields of business and finance; all of the aforesaid services provided to investment professionals representing large scale international investors and institutions, consisting of fund managers and owners, but not the investing publicACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 21, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 18, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 18, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Feb 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 5, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 21, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 14, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance