USPTO serial 75439454
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Accounting; computerized database management; computerized data processing; computerized data verification; economic forecasting and analysis, all for business purposes; business consultation services relating to all the aforesaid services; all of the aforesaid services provided to investment professionals representing large scale international investors and institutions, consisting of fund managers and owners, but not the investing public | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Valuation and analysis of investments; investment information and investment consultation services; investment research services; and preparation of reports relating to valuation and analysis of investments; all of the aforesaid services provided to investment professionals representing large scale international investors and institutions, consisting of fund managers and owners, but not the investing public | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Verification, namely, searching, checking and comparing computerized databases in the fields of business and finance; all of the aforesaid services provided to investment professionals representing large scale international investors and institutions, consisting of fund managers and owners, but not the investing public | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |