Drawing for GEAR UP

USPTO serial 75439525

GEAR UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GEAR UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW T. HOYNE

ANDREW MAYFIELD ARMSTRONG, TEASDALE1 METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001TRANSMISSION TREATMENT, NAMELY, A CHEMICAL ADDITIVE FOR USE WITH TRANSMISSION FLUID FOR AUTOMOBILE ENGINESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 22, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 14, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance