USPTO serial 75440548
ENCAPSULATED SPRING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, REID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENCAPSULATED SPRING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SIDDALL & HILTON SPRINGS LIMITED
West Yorkshire, HX6 2QE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORGAN L FITCH
MORGAN L FITCH FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-3403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | COMPONENTS FOR INNERSPRING MATTRESSES, CUSHIONS AND FOUNDATIONS THEREFOR, INCLUDING BOX SPRINGS, NAMELY, POCKETED SPRING CORES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |