USPTO serial 75441201
REJUV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - MAIL UNIT
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REJUV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, facial cleansers, skin moisturizers, skin, body and hand creams, suncare creams, astringents for cosmetic purposes, skin toners, eyecreams; hand and body lotions, skin, body and hand creams; skin moisturizers, body massage oils, bath care, bath oils, bath gels, skin soaps, non-medicated bath salts, nail polish, cuticle oils, cuticle creams, nail conditioners, liquid make-ups, cream make-ups, powder make-ups, loose powders, rouges, blushers, eye shadows, eye pencils, eye liners, mascaras, lip pencils, lip liners, lipsticks, lip glosses, lip sheens, lip moisturizers, non-medicated foot oils; foot creams, foot lotions, foot moisturizers, foot conditioners, foot scrubs; perfumes, and colognes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | vitamins, mineral supplements, food supplements, and herbal supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |