Drawing for HARMONIC IMAGING

USPTO serial 75441787

HARMONIC IMAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARMONIC IMAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara Z. Morrissey

BARBARA Z MORRISSEY FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, CONTRAST MEDIA FOR MEDICAL IMAGINGACTIVE—
010MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, ULTRASOUND SCANNERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 2, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 6, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 5, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance