USPTO serial 75442084
STENFOOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STENFOOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Situ: Amsterdam, Holland, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES V COSTIGAN
JAMES V COSTIGAN HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's, men's, and children's clothing, namely, suits made of leather, shirts, blouses, skirts, tailleurs, jackets, trousers, shorts, vests, jerseys, pajamas, stockings, singlets, corsets, garters, pants, bras, petticoats, hats, neck ties, rain coats, overcoats, great coats, bathing suits, sports overalls,; wind resistant jackets, ski pants, belts, furs coats, fur scarves, fur gloves, dressing gowns; shoe wear, namely, slippers, shoes, sports shoes, boots and sandals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |