USPTO serial 75442408
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | directory services, namely, providing and on-line human resource directory utilizing a proprietary people search computer process using methods pre-defined as a trade secret by means of a global electronic communications network | ABANDONED | Aug 12, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1999 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |