USPTO serial 75443036
LATIGO LTD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LATIGO LTD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture (living room) Furniture (bedroom) Home furniture and furnishing namely chairs, sofas, beds, tables, rugs, bedcovers, lamps, picture frames, mirrors and chests | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 1, 1998 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely hats, boots, shoes, blouses, shirts, skirts, pants, dresses, belts, belt buckles not of precious metals, belt buckles of precious metals, gloves, shorts, coats, undergarments and outer garments | ACTIVE | May 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |