USPTO serial 75443087
FUTURE THINKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE THINKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY N OWEN
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN WICKERSHAM AND ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, CONFERENCES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS PLANNING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |