USPTO serial 75443566
EASILY AMUSED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASILY AMUSED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, L3R 2M7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL W SIXBEY
DANIEL W SIXBEY SIXBEY FRIEDMAN LEEDOM & FERGUSON8180 GREENSBORO DR STE 800MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | children's clothing, namely, blouses, shirts, jackets, coats, pants, shorts, jeans, skirts, jumpsuits, overalls, t-shirts, sleepers, pyjamas, nightgowns, sweat tops and bottoms, dresses, ties, belts, socks and hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |